MP urges government to abandon “burdensome and complex” IR35 

Former Lord Chancellor calls for an end to IR35, but industry experts accuse government of hypocrisy

A senior Conservative MP has urged the government to scrap IR35 reform to win back voters ahead of the UK’s next general election.

Robert Buckland, MP for South Swindon, put forward his views in an article on Conservative Home on the 12th July, calling the rules “something of a Frankenstein’s monster” and stating that “there is no better time to slay it”.

Buckland, who has also served as the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Wales, suggested that killing off the rules would be “an act of political expediency”. 

With the UK set to head to the polls no later than 28th January 2025, IR35 has been identified as a source of frustration amongst voters – particularly among the Conservative party’s “hardest” support.

As such, several other senior party members have also highlighted the issues caused by the off-payroll rules in recent months, including David Davis and Sir John Redwood.


Rules have become ‘Frankenstein’s monster’

While stating that the rules were “nobly intended to tackle tax avoidance”, Buckland believes that the legislation’s “burdensome and complex nature mean it has become something of a Frankenstein’s monster”.

“The deleterious impact it has had on dynamism, entrepreneurship, jobs, and growth means that there is no better time to slay it once and for all”, he said.

“One of the most immediate problems with IR35 is the treatment of contractors as “disguised employees” for tax purposes. 

“This discourages independent professionals from taking on projects and limits their ability to negotiate terms and work arrangements freely”, he concluded. 

Buckland also noted that the rules are “a double-edged sword”, as IR35 also “places a corresponding administrative and financial burden on businesses that engage with contractors”, he said.

“The ambiguity of the rules makes it difficult for employers to make accurate determinations”, Buckland continued, which often leads to “costly investigations and legal disputes”.

The result of reform has been a “lack of flexibility”, Buckland says, and complying with the rules “stifles innovation and prevents enterprising individuals from operating in a way that allows them to realise their full potential”.


IR35 was “blindly waived through Parliament”

Speaking to Accountancy Age, Dave Chaplin – CEO of IR35 Shield, a compliance firm – labelled the government’s inconsistent attitude towards IR35 as “embarrassing”.

“Here we have one more Tory calling for the abolition of a policy that they voted in themselves, against unanimous opposition, only three years ago.

“They were warned about the damage that the new version of IR35 would inflict, but those warnings were ignored as the legislation, proposed by Treasury and HMRC, was blindly waived through Parliament by Conservative MPs”, he said.

Julia Kermode – CEO of PayePass, an umbrella compliance specialist – also spoke to Accountancy Age. She pointed out that the introduction of the off-payroll rules had led to a “proliferation of non-compliant tax avoidance schemes” operating in the guise of compliant umbrella companies. 

This saw many contractors left with no choice but to operate via umbrella companies – an industry which remains unregulated and where tax avoidance schemes are commonplace.

“These dodgy operators saw an opportunity to advertise their services to firms that transferred contractors onto the payroll as a result of the reform”, Kermode said.

“This government – and whichever political party wins the next general election – must take swift action to stop these firms, which result in massive tax avoidance”, she concluded.


  • worn_out says:

    Presumably this’ll be an empty promise for after the GE from the party that brought about the current shambles.
    There are too many profiting from the current situation, from umbrella companies to IR35 compliance reviewers, for this to be reversed even though contractors and clients would benefit.

  • Mark Miall says:

    Absolutely. There must be tens of thousands of jobs now reliant on the status quo: all those assessments and compliance checks need to be done by someone, after all; and the large number of umbrella companies all need administrators to keep things going.
    Abolition of IR35 would undoubtedly unleash a new wave of entrepreneurship and reduce costs for clients and contractors alike.
    It seems unlikely that any government would grasp the nettle and abolish it, simply because of the IR35-industry job losses it would entail.

  • Ying Tong says:

    Vote for your patriotic party and maybe we’ll scrap inheritance tax, abolish IR35. Yeah, and maybe you won’t. We don’t get fooled again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

Very pleasant. Excellent price for what I needed. I will be a returning customer.

Rhino Review

Mr Paul D

Great staff. Customer focused and a team who recognise and understand their customers 100%.

Rhino Review

Vijay S

Fantastic accountants who helped me submit my last 2 years personal tax returns! I really rate this company!!!

QAccounting Review


Fantastic service.

Rhino Review

Marco G

Been with QAccounting for several months now, very good service, very personal and the best prices I have seen.

QAccounting Review

Muhammed A

I switched over to QAccounting a few months ago and haven't looked back. I get to speak to my own client manager and accountant, the prices were the best I had seen, and I paid exactly what it said online (no extra costs). Very happy with QA.

QAccounting Review

Jeremy H