Treasury considering COVID-19 support for limited company directors

Treasury “considering” COVID-19 support for limited company directors

The Chancellor is finally considering support for contractors working via a limited company

Treasury officials are at last deliberating a scheme that would support the millions of limited company contractors and small business owners who have previously been excluded from government Coronavirus packages, according to The Sun.

The scheme, which was put forward by a coalition of professional bodies, industry experts and campaign groups, could see the government offer a grant for sole directors of limited companies that have lost trading profits because of the pandemic. 

There are around 946,000 companies in the UK that do not employ anyone and 1.1 million micro-businesses that have been set up as director-owners. Many pay themselves a small PAYE salary and a variable dividend, which is dependent on annual profits.

While this is a legitimate and widely used accounting method to manage fluctuating income, it has left one million self-employed people with very little to no support for nearly a whole year. 

Scheme based on average trading profits

Towards the end of last year, the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), campaign group Forgotten Ltd, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) and the former senior advisor to the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS), wrote to the Chancellor proposing the Director’s Income Support Scheme (DISS).

The DISS would mirror the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS), with limited company directors able to claim 80 per cent, up to £2,500 per month, of their average trading profits, before their dividends were taken.

It would be limited to those with trading profits of less than £50,000 a year and assessed on lost profits due to COVID-19, calculated from previous Corporation Tax returns.

The size of the grant a limited company director receives would be based on three years’ worth of accounts and they would need to prove that their business has been directly impacted by the crisis.

No guarantee yet the scheme will be introduced

Initial estimates suggest that the scheme could cost the Treasury between £2-3 billion, depending on take-up. However, a government source told The Sun there is still no guarantee the scheme will be introduced as they need to work out how to close a number of loopholes in order to avoid fraud, waste and legal challenges.

Rebecca Seeley Harris, an independent employment status and IR35 expert who helped draft the proposal, wrote on LinkedIn: “With a third lockdown, these businesses are suffering more than ever and it is imperative that the government takes action now to provide support.

“The Director’s Income Support Scheme (DISS) is a workable and targeted solution, which is why it is effective. There are other groups which also need support and I am looking at targeted solutions for them too. The government are listening and they are actively considering this proposal.”

‘Chancellor must avoid tax rises in near future’

In a statement to the House of Commons on Monday (11 January), Chancellor Rishi Sunak warned that the third national lockdown, while “necessary […] will have further significant economic impact”.

He told MPs that the economy is expected “to get worse before it gets better” and also hinted at tax rises as the “public sector finances have been damaged and will need repair.”

Liz Barclay of BackinBusiness, said: “We welcome the long-awaited news that the Treasury is considering a scheme to support millions of contractors, many of whom have struggled immensely this past year because of the pandemic.

“If the scheme is introduced, it will be a relief to those who were considering leaving this vital sector. However, the Chancellor must avoid any tax rises in the near future as this could hamper businesses trying to recover.

“There also remain some key questions about the scheme. Will the government back-date it and offer support to cover costs from last year? And what about the newly self-employed and those who do not have three years’ worth of accounts? They are legitimate self-employed people who deserve to be supported through these tough times.”


  • M says:

    This is quite unlikely to happen – the Gov have shown us time and again that they don’t particularly want PSC’s. The one can they might want to kick down the road is the loss of taxes should these PSC’s go into liquidation but even that would be swamped by the huge amount of debt the Gov have already racked up.

  • Gary Andrews says:

    You’re 100% right, help isn’t coming. Sunak and Johnson have no intension of helping small business except when it comes to helping themselves to 55% of your headline gross when someone has to pay for this mess.

    Wait, help is at hand, Eton blowhard and (yet another) Telegraph columnist Kwasi Kwarteng has been appointed Business Secretary. We are saved, the competence of this cabinet has no limits.

  • AL says:

    I don’t want government help in this sector, completely undermines IR35 arguments. We are market driven, no different than if all the work goes offshore etc. If the work dries up the company fails.
    If you run a small business you should keep money back for a rainy day.

    • Sou Sak says:

      Not sure I agree!!

      If your argument is right, no business support should be available. Why are large businesses being supported with a furlough scheme to pay for their employees. Shouldn’t they have saved money to pay for their employees or let them be fired. Government can help those employees directly.

      These are exceptional circumstances and the government should help every individual and company to survive in the best possible way. Lot of help has come for the employees, share holders of all types of businesses(by means of furlough thus saving the business’s long term viability, business tax reduction, business loans etc) and the self employed. One category of individuals left out are the owners of micro businesses whose business income has been heavily hit because of the actions of the pandemic.

      So, given the overall circumstances and the support government has extended to individuals and businesses, I see no harm if the owners of micro businesses are supported.

      If the government supports your argument, may be it could come forward and say, if you do not accept our support, you will not be impacted by the IR35 rule changes.

    • Gary Andrews says:

      Simply wrong. Do the big supermarket chains and most other bussinesses who qualified for help operate under IR35? No is the answer you are looking for.
      The rainy day perspective could apply to all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

Very pleasant. Excellent price for what I needed. I will be a returning customer.

Rhino Review

Mr Paul D

Great staff. Customer focused and a team who recognise and understand their customers 100%.

Rhino Review

Vijay S

Fantastic accountants who helped me submit my last 2 years personal tax returns! I really rate this company!!!

QAccounting Review


Fantastic service.

Rhino Review

Marco G

Been with QAccounting for several months now, very good service, very personal and the best prices I have seen.

QAccounting Review

Muhammed A

I switched over to QAccounting a few months ago and haven't looked back. I get to speak to my own client manager and accountant, the prices were the best I had seen, and I paid exactly what it said online (no extra costs). Very happy with QA.

QAccounting Review

Jeremy H