Search Magnifying Glass

Experts propose scheme to provide contractors with COVID-19 support

A coalition of industry bodies, experts and campaign groups have proposed a scheme to support excluded contractors

Around three million freelancers, contractors and small businesses have missed out on emergency Coronavirus support for numerous reasons including, being newly self-employed or directors of limited companies.

In a last-ditch attempt to persuade the Chancellor to address their concerns ahead of the spending review, a coalition of small business leaders, tax experts and industry bodies have mapped out a series of measures needed to plug the gaps in the available support.

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), the campaign group Forgotten Ltd, The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) and the former Senior Advisor to the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS), have written to the Treasury outlining steps to support individuals who work through their own limited company.  

Proposal for a Director’s Income Support Scheme

They have proposed a ‘Director’s Income Support Scheme’ (DISS), which would mirror the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS). Under the proposals, directors would be able to claim 80 per cent of their average trading profits, before their dividends were taken.

As with the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) and SEISS, this would be capped at £2,500 per month. However, rather than being paid to the individual, this taxable grant would be paid into the company, which the FSB said would mitigate the risk of fraud. It also added that property and investment companies would not be eligible.

The letter states that such a proposal could be easily established with information that is already available to HMRC, such as looking at details of trading profits and remuneration submitted by business owners through returns.

The Treasury and HMRC have so far stated that to come up with a comparable scheme for company directors would be impossible because many pay themselves via dividends and there is “no way” to tell whether such income derives from business activity or other investment.

No support risks 7.5 million unemployed

According to figures from the Department of Business, Enterprise and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), there are nearly one million non-employing businesses across the UK and two million micro-entities – those employing less than 10 people.

The bodies calling for the DISS stressed the importance of small businesses to the UK’s economic recovery in their letter, saying that “hundreds of thousands have suffered severe financial hardship, and are now at serious risk of closure.”

It warned that if businesses continue to go without support, “up to 7.5 million” people are at risk of unemployment.” As a result, “we will see fewer businesses in existence, and fewer jobs – these cannot be furloughed, as they won’t exist anymore”.

Georgina Broadhurst, co-founder of Forgotten Ltd, spoke of how “hundreds of thousands of hard-working, tenacious small business owners […] are currently looking down the barrel of a gun.”

She said: “After eight months without meaningful support, many businesses are on the brink of collapse or insolvency. Directors have found themselves having to take on debt or spend their life savings to stay afloat.”

Contractors have used over £20,000 of savings to get by

Many freelancers and contractors have been left with no choice but to rely on their savings to survive financially. A recent survey by Qdos found that 70 per cent of freelancers had used more than £20,000 of savings during the pandemic, and a further one million have been pushed into debt, a study by trade body IPSE, found.

Forgotten Ltd’s Georgina added: “The furlough scheme has supported their 7.5 million employees, but without financial support for the directors and the companies themselves, there will be no jobs for staff to return to by spring.”

The coalition of professional bodies estimates this proposal would cost between £2-6 billion for every three months that it runs. For context, the SEISS scheme cost the Treasury £7 billion in the first three months.

Seb Maley, CEO at Qdos said: “The proposal will be welcomed by many contractors, but for some, it may be too late. Many have already used up their savings and their livelihoods have been destroyed, which has left them with no option but to leave self-employment altogether. 

“We need the government to provide a long-term strategy that will not only support all of those excluded from the schemes but also offer incentives for them to continue working this way.”

By Contractor Weekly

Comments

Add a comment

12 thoughts on “Experts propose scheme to provide contractors with COVID-19 support”

  1. Jim Young

    The Government do have a strategy for small Ltds. It is to encourage us all to take a PAYE salary and not to avoid paying taxes by pulling out dividends instead.

    PAYE is very flexible when using RTI. It is simple to administer.

    Stop avoiding tax, be honest and then maybe the rest of us can pay a little less, rather than paying for the dodgers.

    Having paid PAYE as a director for years, furlough is working for me. Honesty pays.

    • Gary Andrews

      Jim Young
      For someone who purports to have been a Ltd contractor you seem to understand almost nothing of the issues here.
      Strangly you seem to be parroting the HMRC party line about “tax dodgers” with no basis in reality.
      Is that you Jesse?

  2. Andy

    The government are treating companies the same, which is what any company should want.

    The IR35 changes will have a far bigger impact than Covid for micro-consultancies. The only ask of the government is to treat companies the same regardless of size and business model.

    All of these demands for contractor/micro-consultancy support strengthen the govt case to treat small consultancies differently. That is far far worse than anything Covid can throw at us.

    I find it frustrating that contractors aren’t able to see the bigger picture on this; Covid actually demonstrates there is genuine risk to this type of business.

    • Geoff

      I agree 100%, the IR35 changes are the biggest threat. I would also add MTD, in particular for limited companies, will add significant costs and administrative headaches that are yet to be felt.

      • Gary Andrews

        Yes agree totally, IR35 is the real issue.
        Covid is temporary but preventing UK based small businesses being engaged for contracts. Thats’ permanant!
        All those crony outsourcing firms are now picking up our contracts at 3 times our rates … because they can.

    • Andrew Harrison

      “Andy” – yes agree.

  3. Ying Tong

    As a contractor I don’t feel contractors as a whole have much cause for complaint. We read of them here regularly boasting of paying no tax, advocating a complete disregard for the law, proposing abscondment to avoid liabilities. If they choose to operate outside the obligation to make a contribution they can hardly complain if the Chancellor reciprocates. 90% of contractors give the rest a bad name.

    • Gary Andrews

      Hi “Ying Tong”
      Your disinformation smacks of astroturfing. What pressure group are you grifting for?

      • Ying Tong

        Disinformation? Details please. They have been posting here for years.

        • Gary Andrews

          In the Uk we have a phrase “bloke down the pub says …”
          Online disinformation usually equates to “a guy on the internet says …”.
          Your sources are the later, not even email validation needed. You are trying to build a false narrative.

          • Ying Tong

            Would it be mere semantics to mention the thousands of isolated loan charge cases who elected to pay nowt? But don’t keep eveyone in suspense. Enlighten us with the narrative you have identified.

        • Gary Andrews

          More distortion, it’s clear you’ve never run a Ltd company but you’re checking off the ABC of bogus public opinion:
          a) Ask for sources if challenged on your own disinfo -Check
          b) Change the subject if discredited -Check
          c) Double down
          d) Claim to be a person of authority “As a contractor of 700 yrs experience …”
          e) Log in under a new skin to agree with your original self
          Who’s the sponsor? Behavioural Insights?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *