The Tax Effects of Equipment and Training

Graeme Bennett of contractor accountants Forbes Young explains the tax effects of equipment and training costs to the one person owner/director/worker limited company.

Firstly the tax effect is that if the corporation tax rate is 20% (as it is currently) then the actual net cost to the company is 80% of what is paid for the equipment.

Say the equipment/training is £1,000 and you choose not to spend the money, then your company will have £1,000 additional profit so pay £200 corporation tax.

If you then take what is left as dividends additional to £30,518 net already taken in this tax year and take £7,956 salary (i.e. which totals the £41,865 gross higher rate tax threshold), you will pay income tax on those £800 dividends of 25% i.e. Â£200.

Therefore in summary not to spend £1,000 on equipment/training but instead to take as a dividend will normally lead to a £400 tax bill for a higher rate taxpayer. The real cost of £1,000 expenditure here then, will be net £600.

In addition, the more your company spends on equipment and training, the stronger your IR35 position will be.

 

4 Comments

  • Danny says:

    Sorry, but I find this really confusing. You’re mixing negatives with positives. As a contractor working outside of IR35 (or at least striving to always do so), should I take the £1000 as a dividend and then spend it on equipment/training, or should I claim the £1000 as equipment/training expenses?

    I just feel the article is missing a conclusion, and I would love to know what it is.

  • Graeme Bennett says:

    The article gives you a choice and explains the actual cost of an equipment purchase if you are a higher rate tax payer. You can either take the £600 as a net dividend after having paid CT and IT on it, or spend the £1000 on a company purchase.

  • northernladuk says:

    Have you tried a search Danny?

  • Danny says:

    Graeme – Thanks, but, again, I think you’re writing for people who have a solid grasp of the way the tax system works in relation to contractors. I don’t. Incidentally, I’m not stupid, I just find tax a black art that I don’t fully understand, which is why I subscribe to Contractor Weekly.

    northernladuk – Thanks, but I don’t believe writing articles for a site with search functionality means that you can omit a clear conclusion. I’m not trolling, I just don’t believe the article was written in such a way that someone who is confused by the tax system – for example, me – would conclude “Ah, OK, *that’s* what I should do the next time I want to sign up for a course”. Surely that’s what the article should do, no?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

Very pleasant. Excellent price for what I needed. I will be a returning customer.

Rhino Review

Mr Paul D

Great staff. Customer focused and a team who recognise and understand their customers 100%.

Rhino Review

Vijay S

Fantastic accountants who helped me submit my last 2 years personal tax returns! I really rate this company!!!

QAccounting Review

Natalie

Fantastic service.

Rhino Review

Marco G

Been with QAccounting for several months now, very good service, very personal and the best prices I have seen.

QAccounting Review

Muhammed A

I switched over to QAccounting a few months ago and haven't looked back. I get to speak to my own client manager and accountant, the prices were the best I had seen, and I paid exactly what it said online (no extra costs). Very happy with QA.

QAccounting Review

Jeremy H